Mitigative Healing
Sydera made a very interesting and informative post regarding healing meters over at a few days ago, and even though the topic is discussed over and over and over, there are still too many RLs that rely heavily on healing meters. Part of the problem stems from a healing philosophy that is very narrow-minded. When we think of heals, far too often we think of a reactive spell, cast to return life back after a damaging blow. Luckily, Blizzard has really made solid attempts at implementing various healing styles - and on the other side of the reactive heal, is the damage mitigation.

The problem is that most meters don't have an effective set up for measuring damage mitigation. The best way I can think of to do it would be simply to combine damage absorbed through a healer's spell, and add it to actual amount of healing done. Subtract over-heals from that, and you have a much better estimation of the power and ability of your healers.

However, the problem doesn't extend to merely meters. Let's take a look at the new Legendary weapon offered through Ulduar - the first healing legendary item.

Val'anyr, Hammer of Ancient Kings.

I do have WoWhead tooltips set up, but for those of us who cannot see the tooltips from our current locations *ahemworkcough*, here's the text:

Binds when picked up
Main HandMace
93 - 298 DamageSpeed 1.80
(108.8 damage per second)
+52 Stamina
+54 Intellect
Durability 125 / 125
Requires Level 80Equip: Improves critical strike rating by 47 (1.02% @ L80).
Equip: Improves haste rating by 46 (1.4% @ L80).
Equip: Increases spell power by 587.
Equip: Your healing spells have a chance to cause Blessing of Ancient Kings for 15 seconds allowing your heals to shield the target absorbing damage equal to 15% of the amount healed.

Just to put a little perspective on how the developers intend for thus buff to work, let's read a little explanation from Bornakk, that shmexy Blue Blizzard Orc: (the forum thread is here)

"The way this works is that when the proc happens (which is a 10% chance whenever a hot or direct spell heals, with a 45 sec internal cooldown) you gain a buff (the Blessing) on yourself. Now all of your heals for the next 15 sec cause an 8 sec damage shield. The shield stacks with itself. It includes healing done by subsequent ticks of existing hots on the target. Note that the spell has to actually heal, so hots ticking on a fully-healed target cannot cause the proc. However the shield is based on the size of the heal itself, not the amount healed – i.e. 100% overhealing will not proc the Blessing on the healer, but the shield itself includes overhealing once the Blessing is active. The shield can grow to a maximum size of 20,000 damage absorbed. "

(NB: This is only a small portion of his entire explanation - he also lists some examples)

Part of what prompted this post was a discussion I was having with some fellow Alliance mates on our forum. I generally roll my eyes and avoid discussions of which class better deserves an item, or who can get better use out of it, but after reading the tooltip and the Blizzard explanation, I can't help but feel a little worried for some of my fellow priests of the Discipline persuasion. A lot of their aid comes in the form of shields - not necessarily direct heals.

The interesting thing is that while promoting this new strategy of "less reactive, more proactive" healing via mitigation, Blizz still seems to be having trouble integrating the two effectively. Essentially, with this mace, your heals have a chance to proc a shield. However, your shields do not have that same chance. In addition, the size of the shield procced is based on the size of your heal.

There is a glyph for priests that allows your shields to heal for 20% of the absorption amount of your shield, and Blizz has reassured us that this can proc the Blessing of Ancient Kings. But, even with that, that glyphed heal is not very large, and since the size of the proc shield is based on the size of the heal that causes it, even this will not be very effective.

However, I am by no means an expert on Discipline priests, and I merely intend this to voice some of my concerns. I would really hate to see Disc priests get by-passed entirely for the chance to have this mace. But, it may be too soon to tell, and it could very well be that after all is said and done, and we start to see these maces in action, that all my concerns are for naught.

But even if that is the case, I still maintain my stance that there need to be some changes in how damage mitigation efforts are valued. I do also wonder if tanks have similar problems - if your class is known for its skill in avoiding damage altogether, as opposed to being able to survive big hits, does this in turn cause problems for evaluating tank performance?

Regardless, before Disc priests ever get their "Bella shields" we've heard rumors about (AoE shields, mmm), this is an issue that needs to be addressed and resolved in some way - and I don't think it would be very difficult, with some simple redesigning.
9 Responses
  1. Fuubaar Says:

    Speaking of Disc Priests, I'm a very interested in their healie ways. I know that their "bubbles" are extremely effective & their heals are powerful. Why would anyone not want to have one of these guys heal you?

    I'm extremely interested in having Disc as my Dual spec for my little Abi.

    Tell me why you chose Holy over Disc... I MUST KNOW!

    Thanks :D

  2. Jessabelle Says:

    @ Fuu - There's actually a very good reason for that. Disc priests excel at single target healing, whereas Holy Priests are more for aoe heals. We always have several pally healers, who are also single target healers, so that it makes more sense for me to stay holy.

    I am thinking about dropping shadow as my second spec and picking up disc though!

  3. Fuubaar the healer? Says:

    That's understandable about the AoE stuff.

    TBH in my last MMO, I was a white mage (a healer) for the majority of it. I really enjoyed healing for a long time but I just have never found the healing class that suited me. I really didn't enjoy healing as a paladin. I do enjoy Druid healing a lot better but I felt unsafe with mainly having to rely on hots. Once I rolled my priest, I fell in love with having the bubble & both hots & big heals. I may have found my healing class :D

    My major concern is that if I do dual spec Disc, I'll never be able to DPS on that toon because that's just what happens lol.

  4. Jessabelle Says:

    I love playing a priest. We just have so many heals at our disposal! And then shadow is just the coolest thing EVAR.

    I'm dual specced shadow now, and occasionally I get a chance to raid shadow, but yeah. Almost all the time I'm raiding holy, of course. But I do a lot of dailies and other quests, so I still spend a lot of time using my shadow spec. That would be my main concern about giving up my shadow spec for disc.

  5. Fuubaar Says:

    Disc.'s are the unkillable healers in pvp. I doubt any mobs could lay a finger on you if you dod it correctly.

    As Shadow, I'm having a really hard time killing a larger group. I dont have any AoE's yet, the only thing I can do is tab target SW: Pain then rotate back through & put more dots on other targets to bring on the XP. Being a lvl 65 is sure boring :(

  6. Fallback Says:

    From someone who has not leveled a priest past 16, I can openly say that I feel sad..

    Leveling a priest is extremely difficult. You almost HAVE to take it slow and only grind green quests.

    rogues can kill elites 4 levels higher without much difficulty (araj the summoner in wpl was downed by my level 51 rogue, he is level 59 elite?)

    Ultimately, I will write a "how to" when I figure it out myself.


  7. Fallback Says:

    oh.. and the mace, imho is a healer weapon.. no doubt about it!

    Which healer benefits most from it? meh. if the person has it, it is a testament to their healing abilities and deserve it.


  8. Jessabelle Says:

    @ Fallback

    I really didn't have any trouble leveling my priest, to be honest - and I leveled holy. A lot of the time I had a leveling partner, a mage, so I'm sure that had something to do with it.

    I don't think there's any debate that the mace is for healers - the proc says "your healing spells"... so it's kinda pointless if you don't have any healing spells!

    I foresee huntard thievery.

  9. Fallback Says:

    fricken hunters!

    They'd prob think it would work with their BM restore health/5

    hey, knowing blizz, they probably made it work exactly like that..

    I wonder if it procs off healing stream =/ maby not since it is pet..=s but meh, I don't care yet :P

Creative Commons License
Miss Medicina by Miss Medicina is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
Based on a work at
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at